After having look forward to this for months, and even throwing up a “Sunshine is Gonna Kick Ass” post here on the Monkey, I have three words I must get out: WHAT…THE…FU*K?!?!?!?!
Sunshine
Monkey Rating: 0 Opposable Thumbs Up (out of 5)
WARNING: Spoilers ahead.
Will someone please bring back Danny Boyle? The Director who brought us Trainspotting and 28 Days Later? He’s apparently gone missing, if Sunshine is any indication.
After having look forward to this for months, and even throwing up a “Sunshine is Gonna Kick Ass” post here on the Monkey, I have three words I must get out: WHAT…THE…FU*K?!?!?!?!
So much promise. This movie had SO much promise. A fresh scientific idea, a strong director, a good lead actor. What could go wrong?
Uh, how about everything? If there's a recipe for ruining a great sci-fi premise, this film followed it – and then some.
The story begins with a concise plot summary narrated by Capa (Cillian Murphy), the physicist for the ship Icarus II. The vessel’s mission: to deliver and detonate a large bomb into the sun, thereby somehow kick-starting the big lug so we can all live happily ever after. Believe it or not, as silly as that premise sounds, it’s not the movie’s major flaw. Oh no, there are plenty of those.
We're then introduced to the crew: Searle, the ship’s psych officer who’s “crazier than the crew,” Corazon, the biologist who’s running the plant/oxygen garden on board, Kaneda, the Captain, Cassie, the pilot, Trey, the navigator, Mace, the engineer, and Harvey, the communications officer.
It’s a wholly unbelievable cast of unqualified scientists – a fact that gnaws at you throughout the film. Here’s a question: if this mission is the last hope for saving mankind, why would you send only one scientist from each field of study? Did the folks who planned this mission ever consider that if the communications officer kicks the bucket, the crew won’t be able to talk to anyone? Can anyone run the oxygen garden if Corazon chokes on a space pretzel? The worst example: Capa, the physicist, is the only crewmember who can detonate the bomb. That’s ridiculous. Hell, even Noah took two of each animal on the Ark.
I have an idea…how about a crew of about 70, with entire teams to manage each scientific discipline? Not enough space onboard? Then BUILD A BIGGER FREAKING SHIP. You’re not collecting rocks on the moon…you’re SAVING MANKIND. You’re going to want to do this right, aren’t you? Spend the entire space program’s budget and lay everyone off. They’ll be dead anyway if you don’t.
Also, it might help to send a crew that has a little more experience than the one in Sunshine. The average age of the team is about 30. How about some old timers who have done this before? Think they might come in handy? It seems like they took the cast from Big Brother XXIV and threw them onto the ship.
I’m sure youth was a factor when the crew is faced with a major decision about halfway through the film. You see, Icarus II is so named because there was once an Icarus I. As they approach the sun, they discover the original Icarus spacecraft, stuck in the Sun’s orbit for seven years, obviously having failed in its mission to jump start the sun.
This is the decision the crew must make: do we veer slightly off course to rendezvous with Icarus I, to see if anyone’s alive? Also, what if its bomb is still intact? Wouldn’t that give us another shot at re-igniting the sun if our payload failed?
At this point, a newborn baby in the front row, a senior citizen struggling to chew a kernel of popcorn, and mime right next to me all said in unison: “No way, dumbasses!”
I agreed. If I could have jumped into the movie and smacked every crew member I would have done it. Remember, since this team is saving the world, they must be the world’s very best scientists, right? Would such a collection of brilliant minds even consider this? Of course not.
But guess what happens?? These idiots actually choose to rendezvous with Icarus I. Why? Because “two bombs are better than one,” a theory proffered by the ship’s Psych officer. Are you fu*king kidding me? I’m a blogger, not a scientist, but even I know that you encounter tremendous risk to the original mission if you veer even slightly off course when you’re headed toward the sun. These are the world’s best scientists?
Sure enough, Trey, the navigator, changes the ship’s course – but forgets to recalibrate the heat shields (so important when flying toward the sun). Forgetting the fact that Trey might have cheated on his Icarus entrance exams, it might have helped if he had some help during this exercise. Instead, he performs the task all by himself, in the middle of the night, while everyone is asleep. I ask again, these are the world’s best scientists??
If all of this isn’t enough to make you ask for a refund, don’t worry – the worst is yet to come.
With limited oxygen supply due to a fire in the oxygen garden (don’t ask), the crew calculates that there is enough air for four people to complete the mission. But the computer, a cheap HAL 9000 knockoff, asserts that there are five people onboard. Confused, Capa heads to the sun observation deck, where he finds…a zombie! At least that’s what I think it was.
It was either a zombie or the still alive Captain from the original Icarus I, who somehow survived for seven years on limited food and water. Oh, and he has no skin. I guess the sun burned it off. In any event, it was hard to tell because any time the creature was onscreen, he was blurry and the camera started to shake. I’m guessing the F/X budget ran out right about then.
From there, the movie descends into a slasher film, the zombie chasing the remaining crew around the ship. I’m not joking. Even as I type this, I can’t believe it. But hey, at least you can’t blame the bad scientists for this development. How could they have been prepared for a skinless zombie trying to kill them? They don’t have that module in the flight simulator.
No, the person you can blame is Danny Boyle, for taking this premise and blowing it to hell. Maybe he got his movies confused. Maybe he was in the middle of this sci-fi epic and had a 28 Days Later flashback, so he accidentally threw a zombie in there. If that was the case, maybe he should have thrown in some Trainspotting as well. This mission’s already got a group of bad scientists and a zombie – how can a heroin-addicted Scottish stowaway do any harm?
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
Monkey Review: Sunshine (2007)
Posted by Steve Farrell at 9:15 AM 5 comments
Labels: In Theater Reviews
Monday, July 30, 2007
the new Hulk- First Look!
the new Hulk (to be played by Ed Norton) has finally been revealed...
more info after the jump...
Click here for more info from First Showing.
Posted by Foley at 9:44 AM 0 comments
Elizabethtown- a Netflix Review
Elizabethtown features two actors I don't like, got a 45 on Metacritic, and suffered review quotes such as
"It's obvious now that the cinematic junk routinely released every Friday can be safely categorized as a mere failure. But this alleged comedy is a whole other species entirely. This is a bona fide, absolute, unmitigated fiasco. "
So why did I like it so much?
Netflix queue: 31 (out of 200)
I really don't get it. Orlando Bloom has made his career playing medieval fantasy roles, and has pretty much failed at anything else. Kirsten Dunst, well, I couldn't stand her back in Interview with the Vampire, and I certainly haven't grown to appreciate her more now. Frankly, I don't understand at all how she lands these romantic lead roles. I can't get past believing that someone would actually date that chick.
Reviewers generally hated this flick by Cameron Crowe (Fast Times, Almost Famous, Say Anything, and the one with the short scientologist that everyone hates). So I'm struggling to figure out why I enjoyed it.
Am I getting soft? Considering that my next post is going to be a double-barreled assault on both the brilliant mistake of Sunshine and the unmitigated disaster of Die Another Day, I don't think my standards have dropped.
What else could it be?
Honestly, I think the divergence here is that Elizabethtown is a wandering meditation- there are enough subplots and tangents for at least 3 movies here. Also, the movie has multiple false endings. Just when you think the story is wrapping up, it turns down another road and starts a new adventure. I can see how many people who aren't in the right mood could be frustrated.
So what is the right mood? Road Trip mentality. Seriously. To enjoy this movie one needs to be in the frame of mind like when you are on a long drive, and know there really isn't much you can do but enjoy the drive and whatever turns up around the corner. The radio picks up whatever station it can, and you are cool with that. This analogy is less of a stretch than you would think, because the movie actually features a very long road trip, complete with scenic stops and road music. But even the rest of the movie works like a road trip- the story starts in one place and continuously meanders into totally new territory. If you aren't the type that needs resolution to every plot point, you might enjoy this.
And if there is one thing Cameron Crowe is good at, it's finding great music for his movies. This one is no different- even if you hate this movie, you can't help but love the soundtrack.
Elizabethtown is a good date movie. It touches on warm subjects such as love, family, and keeping the world in perspective, but that's all largely superficial. In the end, it's like taking a short tour through several stories with some great tunes coming through the radio. Just kick back, get comfortable, and enjoy the trip.
"It's obvious now that the cinematic junk routinely released every Friday can be safely categorized as a mere failure. But this alleged comedy is a whole other species entirely. This is a bona fide, absolute, unmitigated fiasco. "
So why did I like it so much?
Netflix queue: 31 (out of 200)
I really don't get it. Orlando Bloom has made his career playing medieval fantasy roles, and has pretty much failed at anything else. Kirsten Dunst, well, I couldn't stand her back in Interview with the Vampire, and I certainly haven't grown to appreciate her more now. Frankly, I don't understand at all how she lands these romantic lead roles. I can't get past believing that someone would actually date that chick.
Reviewers generally hated this flick by Cameron Crowe (Fast Times, Almost Famous, Say Anything, and the one with the short scientologist that everyone hates). So I'm struggling to figure out why I enjoyed it.
Am I getting soft? Considering that my next post is going to be a double-barreled assault on both the brilliant mistake of Sunshine and the unmitigated disaster of Die Another Day, I don't think my standards have dropped.
What else could it be?
Honestly, I think the divergence here is that Elizabethtown is a wandering meditation- there are enough subplots and tangents for at least 3 movies here. Also, the movie has multiple false endings. Just when you think the story is wrapping up, it turns down another road and starts a new adventure. I can see how many people who aren't in the right mood could be frustrated.
So what is the right mood? Road Trip mentality. Seriously. To enjoy this movie one needs to be in the frame of mind like when you are on a long drive, and know there really isn't much you can do but enjoy the drive and whatever turns up around the corner. The radio picks up whatever station it can, and you are cool with that. This analogy is less of a stretch than you would think, because the movie actually features a very long road trip, complete with scenic stops and road music. But even the rest of the movie works like a road trip- the story starts in one place and continuously meanders into totally new territory. If you aren't the type that needs resolution to every plot point, you might enjoy this.
And if there is one thing Cameron Crowe is good at, it's finding great music for his movies. This one is no different- even if you hate this movie, you can't help but love the soundtrack.
Elizabethtown is a good date movie. It touches on warm subjects such as love, family, and keeping the world in perspective, but that's all largely superficial. In the end, it's like taking a short tour through several stories with some great tunes coming through the radio. Just kick back, get comfortable, and enjoy the trip.
Posted by Foley at 8:57 AM 4 comments
Monday, July 23, 2007
Netflix Review: Breach (2007)
Is this the way you would use Chris Cooper? They might as well have cast him in Broken Arrow 2.
Breach
Suggested Netflix Queue Position: 76, just ahead of Saw II
Imagine you’re a producer and that you have been given the green light to make a movie. It’s a movie about disgraced CIA spy Robert Hanssen. You’re able to get Academy Award caliber actors Chris Cooper and Laura Linney to star.
Sounds like a pretty good deal, huh? A naturally riveting story, anchored by two great actors. How could you possibly screw this up? Well, casting Ryan Phillippe is a good start. I don’t have anything against the guy, it’s just that he’s not a very good actor. I don’t know how he’s managed to be in some pretty strong films: Flags of Our Fathers, Gosford Park and Crash. He must have one hell of an agent.
But Breach, while a disappointment, certainly doesn’t suffer from poor acting on the whole. Cooper, as Hanssen, is compelling as the conflicted spy, and Linney, who continues to be underrated, turns in a strong performance as callous agent Kate Burroughs. But here’s where Phillippe, as fledgling agent Eric O’Neill, sticks out - and not in a good way. It’s clear that alongside these two heavyweights, Phillippe is in over his head. He thinks he’s in a spy thriller; Cooper and Linney think they’re in a character study.
To give you an idea of the uneven playing field evident here, this would be like…well, like casting Ryan Phillippe opposite two Oscar-worthy actors.
But you can’t lay the blame for this underachievement entirely at Phillippe’s feet. In fact, you can’t even blame him for his character choices in playing O’Neill. Why? Because Director Billy Ray, along with writers Adam Mazer and William Rotko, turn this into a clichéd spy thriller. So it’s not as if Phillippe’s acting is even out of context here.
O’Neill, a new agent, is sent to work alongside Hanssen by Burroughs. Very quickly, the kid discovers that he’s not just working alongside Hanssen – he’s there to track him and gather information because Hanssen is thought to be selling secrets to national enemies.
Why, when building a case against a dangerous traitor, would they send a clueless new agent to gather the evidence? Good question. They try to explain it away in the movie, but it doesn’t quite hold water.
What follows isn’t the character chess match we should be seeing, but a series of trite spy scenes, complete with O’Neill sneaking around Hanssen’s office looking through his bags and computer data, etc., against the backdrop of a canned, faux-suspenseful spy score, while Hanssen is just down the hall but on his way back. Do you think O’Neill will get out of his office in time?? Hanssen, by the way, is supposed to never miss a detail about anything.
Is this the way you would use Chris Cooper? They might as well have cast him in Broken Arrow 2. The thing is, Ray actually begins to scratch the surface for what this whole complicated internal web means to the individual characters. Linney’s Burroughs is quite hardened from the strain of internal surveillance. O’Neill is just getting his first taste of such strain – and isn’t sure if he’s cut out for it. Hanssen is on an entirely different level of strain. This, along with the base story, presents more than enough material to build an intelligent, original film. It just doesn’t happen.
Let me be clear: Breach isn’t a bad movie. It’s just an underachievement when you consider the talent assembled and the material featured. This is one of the biggest spy scandals in U.S. history, along with a very talented pair of actors.
How could you screw this up again?
Posted by Steve Farrell at 2:55 PM 0 comments
Labels: Netflix Review
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)