Showing posts with label Rant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rant. Show all posts

Monday, July 2, 2007

the Naked Monkey Run: Streaking through the Internet so you don't have to

I got my iPhone! I got my iPhone!



Time for another quick run through the theater aisles...



Christian Bale says there will be a Batman 3...

It's been official for a while that Indy 4 was gonna suck, but this spy photo of Shia as a greaser is just another nail in the coffin... God damn you, Lucas!

more photos, rumors and slander after the jump...


Some more revealing Indy pics here. Wow, could I be less interested to see a geriatric Indy? Harrison looks like hell.

Is this Benecio Del Toro preparing for his role as the Wolf Man?

PETA is apparently pissed off at the treatment of Speed Racer's monkey Chim Chim.


Marisa Tomei is finally topless in a movie. Um, isn't this about a decade late?

Whatever happened to Richard Kelly's follow up to Donnie Darko, Southland Tales?

Looks like Kelly isn't done just yet... His next one is the box.

I'm not a huge Jack Black fan, but Be Kind, Rewind is gonna be hilarious.

Finally. The full Bourne Ultimatum trailer is finally out! Say it with me: Best. movie. of. the. summer.

Read More...

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Top 10 Actors in Hollywood

Here are two of them



Compiling a list of the best actors in Hollywood is no easy task. New actors burst onto the scene, hot actors fade away. And let’s not forget the fact that as a whole, Hollywood is simply producing dumber movies.



Ranking the Top 10 Actors in Hollywood

Please mark this moment in time. It’s the end of June in 2007, and this is a list of who I think are the best actors in Hollywood. I ask you to mark this point in time because this is such a fluid list. So many things can change so quickly. New actors burst onto the scene, hot actors fade away. And let’s not forget the fact that as a whole, Hollywood is simply producing dumber movies. Tough to locate some strong performances between Saw 4 and Georgia Rule.

So without further adieu, here are my top actors in movies TODAY – not all time. The list is in no particular order:

Tom Hanks
Actually in danger of falling off the list. Began a brilliant 10 year run with consecutive Oscars for Philadelphia and Forrest Gump. Also been nominated for Saving Private Ryan and the underrated Cast Away. He’s in danger of falling off because of a few recent clunkers: The Da Vinci Code and The Terminal among them.

Clive Owen
Clive has some mo. Beginning in 2004, he’s on a very strong run, with an Oscar nom for Closer and strong performances in King Arthur, Derailed, and Inside Man. He got absolutely robbed for not getting a nomination for his superb work in Children of Men. And don’t forget Sin City. Look forward to more work from Clive.

Daniel Day-Lewis
Admittedly, Day-Lewis probably isn’t eligible for this list because he doesn’t work enough. Dude dropped out of acting to become a freaking COBBLER in Europe. But his ability is indisputable: He won an Oscar for My Left Foot, and was nominated for In the Name of the Father and for his spine-chilling turn as Bill the Butcher in the vastly underrated Gangs of New York. That’s 3 Oscar noms in 9 films, and many feel he should have been nominated for his work in The Boxer.

Sean Penn
It pains me to admit this because, in his private life, Penn is an idiot. But his acting skill is undeniable. He’s been nominated for 4 Oscars since 1996, for Dead Man Walking, Sweet and Lowdown, I Am Sam, and finally winning for his performance in Mystic River. And don’t forget his strong work in 21 Grams and The Assassination of Richard Nixon. Dude takes himself way too seriously, but hey, whatever works for you.

Ben Kingsley
Surprised? You shouldn’t be. Kingsley has been very good for a long time. Starting with a Best Actor statue for Ghandi, he’s also been nominated for his work in Bugsy, Sexy Beast (in the best villain performance since Anthony Hopkins’ Hannibal Lecter, and the best since), and House of Sand and Fog. Sir Ben is the type of actor through which a movie receives instant credibility.

Johnny Depp
Has there been a more daring actor in the last 20 years? Depp’s choice in roles is downright strange, but it’s a tribute to his talent that he makes the roles work. It may surprise you that he’s only been nominated for two Oscars: Pirates of the Caribbean (Curse of the Black Pearl) and Finding Neverland. But he seems to have escaped Oscar attention for so many other fine performances, including Ed Wood, Chocolat and Blow.

Charlize Theron
Proving she’s not just a pretty face, Theron has racked up the accolades in short time, including her Oscar win for Monster and another nom for North Country. Unfortunately, Aeon Flux is on the resume as well.

Judi Dench
Dame Dench is the best actor working today. Listen to this impressive list of Oscar noms: Mrs. Brown, Shakespeare in Love (she won), Chocolat, Iris, Mrs. Henderson Presents, and Notes on a Scandal. That’s 6 nominations – in 9 years. Wow.

Hilary Swank
An Oscar win for Boys Don’t Cry. Another one for her brilliant performance in Million Dollar Baby. A strong performance in The Gift and fun turns in The Core and Insomnia. Swank is always a threat to take home a statue, and doesn’t appear to be going anywhere anytime soon.

Leonardo DiCaprio
He started out as a precocious child actor but has since turned into one of the best thespians working today. He was nominated for What’s Eating Gilbert Grape, The Aviator and Blood Diamond, but also turned in great performances in The Departed, Catch Me If You Can, and Gangs of New York. There’s plenty more to come from Leo.

Threatening to enter the Top 10:

Christian Bale
Bale is starting to put together a pretty strong resume. His work in American Psycho was brilliant and underrated. He was terrific in The Machinist, very good in The Prestige, and has easily been the best Batman.

Phillip Seymour Hoffman
Hoffman’s a newcomer to the list, but he’s been around a while. Everyone knows about his brilliant, Oscar winning turn in Capote. But he was also quite convincing in Mission Impossible: III, and did some underrated work in both Talented Mr. Ripley and Along Came Polly.

Read More...

Friday, June 15, 2007

Batman’s new suit revealed, and the Evolution of the Batman costume

The evolution of the bat...


Entertainment Weekly has the first pic of the Dark Knight’s new batsuit….
We’ve got the pic after the jump, as well as a rundown of the evolution of the Batsuit....


You know, I warned you about this when I discussed Batman’s new vehicle—Is Nolan taking the Batman franchise down the same road to hell? While the new suit still retains that ‘body armor-like’ quality that is less comic-booky and more realistic, it’s pretty obvious that they still feel the need to keep changing things up and adding more crap.

Let’s take a look at the evolution of Batman’s suit through the movies, culminating with the latest redesign:


That ain’t a joke, kids. For those of you too young to have ever seen this- this was the actual batsuit worn on the campy Batman and Robin tv show from the 60’s. I think the eyebrows painted on the mask were an excellent touch.


Ah yes, the first Batman movie. That’s a helluva improvement over the tv show. The suit was impressive and simple, though it was so stiff Keaton looked like he was fighting in a body cast. I still can’t figure out how the hell Keaton got selected for the role.


The first suit redesign. I think this was actually a step in the right direction- the suit looks more armor-like, and actually simpler than the first one.


What exactly were we supposed to infer from this redesign- that Batman came out of the closet and got himself a boytoy? Was director Joel Shumacher living out his inner fantasies here? I’m an openminded guy, I know Robin was always part of the comic, and I’ll even grant you that Val Kilmer is kind of sexy in all that skintight latex, but this isn’t the movie I thought I was buying a ticket for. Yeah, this one pretty much marked the beginning of the end. I actually didn’t mind Val in the titular role, but adding Robin was the proverbial shark that Batman jumped. Fuck you, Joel Shumacher.


I think it’s great that Batman finally got in touch with his inner feelings, and isn’t afraid to be himself. And can I just say… Fab-u-lous! The bulging codpieces? The molded-in nipples? De-lish! Do you think George Clooney ever puts this suit back on when he’s bangin’ one of his model/girlfriends?



This is a costume from the lessor-known 1998 adult film- BatBoobs. Ironically, it’s still better costume design than the crap that Joel Shumacher put up.



This is me lookin’ fly for a New Year's party I went to. Notice how I went for the old-skool Batman aesthetic? I put this together in 15 minutes after taking a couple monster bong hits, and it still looks better than that clusterfuck Clooney had to wear. Although I have to admit the latex pants and glowing codpiece would have come in handy later that night…



This is possibly the worst Batman mask I have ever seen- what are those, antennae?
Yep, STILL better than Shumacher’s crap.



Ah, back to basics- the Batman Begins costume. This one harkens back to the Batman Returns costume, and I think we can all agree this has been the best suit so far. It doesn’t hurt that Bale has been the best Batman as well (other than myself at New Years). But here’s the $64,000 question- will Nolan start heading down the same path of overdesigning the suit?


There it is- the newest Batsuit. This is a scan from Entertainment Weekly, originally scooped by Aint it Cool (and kudos for that score). As for the suit- I really like the fact that it actually looks like body armor, almost football pads. But it’s starting to get a little busy, and almost too techy. Notice the text- razors on the forearms, multi-functional cape… Could this be the beginning of a Robocop-inspired design direction for future Batman sequels? Let’s hope not. I don’t want to see batarangs shooting out of his wrists or a friggin Inspector Gadget helicopter popping up out of his head, dammit.

Read More...

Thursday, June 14, 2007

National Treasure 2: More Inside Dish

It's Coming, Like it or Not


The studio execs felt optimistic that the Coppola kid could turn on his special, bad-acting charm and win over the locals. Didn’t quite turn out that way. The Monkey photog gathered this dish from the event.


National Treasure 2: More Inside News

Foley uncovered some nice Czechoslovakian dish on Natty Treasure 2, the upcoming (and latest) Nick Coppola disaster.

Well, guess what? There’s MORE inside buzz to be shared about NT2, uncovered by yours truly. It turns out there was a pre-advanced preliminary screening in Wichita, KS last night, and the Monkey has gotten its opposable thumbs on what REALLY happened at the event.

Held in a rickety barn near the water tower, the screening was highly anticipated by studio execs as a way to gauge audience reaction prior to the December 21 release. Strangely, the town folk didn’t share the studio’s excitement. When announced, reactions could only be classified as mixed:

* Doc, the Barber: “National Treasure 2? I guess that means there was a first one?”
* Gus, the Blacksmith: “Are you kidding? After they poured lemon juice on the Declaration of Independence?”
* Nancy, the town slut: “I liked the first one, but I wasn’t watching the screen the whole time.”

Still, the execs felt optimistic that the Coppola kid could turn on his special, bad-acting charm and win over the locals. Didn’t quite turn out that way. The Monkey photog gathered these pics from the event:



"Don't ever show that movie here again!"



It wasn't the theater nachos, folks.



A local on her way to the screening


So as you can see, it’s a pretty rocky start for Natty Treasure 2. To be fair about the Monkey Trade, we’ll post news from the AVP2 advanced screening as well.

I’m in for a world of hurt.

Read More...

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

The Monkey Predicts... a new Celeb Hottie on the Horizon

Who is this hottie and why am I talking about her? Glad you asked...



I've got a 6th sense. No, I don't see dead people. I see hot people.


I have the ability to spot hotties in crappy movies who are going to turn into big celebrity stars. And I've got a new one for you to watch.

Trust me, you'll be seeing a lot more of her soon.

How did I acquire this mutant power? I really don't know. I wasn't bitten by a radioactive spider, or subjected to gamma rays in a failed experiment. I do know that the first time I discovered I had this gift, I was 15. I spotted an unknown actress named Sharon Stone in a crappy movie called King Solomon's Mines, and I knew at that moment that she was going to be a megastar. Keep in mind, this is before she had done Police Academy 4. I'm not some bandwagon groupie.

There have been other occasions where I have spotted future hottie celebs- in '92 I spotted Monica Bellucci in Bram Stoker's Dracula, and then spotted her again in Brotherhood of the Wolf. There was no doubt in my mind that she was going to go big. A few years later? She's in Matrix Reloaded, and a future of superstardom awaits her, thank you very much

My newest vision? Noureen deWulf. 'Who?' you are saying, and that's exactly my point. She hasn't done much so far, mostly some tv and a couple small roles in crap movies like National Lampoon's Pledge This! But she had one brief scene and one line--ONE LINE--in Ocean's Thirteen (she was one of the Expo Girls- didn't even have a name). And my sixth sense went off for the first time in a long time.

Now, you get to enjoy my talent as well. Soon, you will be seeing her everywhere, and you will be able to brag 'I knew about her way back when she was playing roles that didn't even have a name'.

Don't worry, I'll let you know when my sixth sense goes off again with someone new.

Read More...

Thursday, June 7, 2007

AVP 2 for National Treasure 2: The Monkey Trade

Would you trade this...

...for this?



OK, so trading National Treasure 2 for Alien vs. Predator 2 is not exactly the most newsworthy development in Hollywood, but I’d like you, the reader, to understand the significant pain that will be bartered here.


Alien vs. Predator 2 for National Treasure 2

A significant trade has gone down here at the Monkey.

As you may or may not already know – and you do if you’ve read about the authors – Foley is a huge fan of the heist film genre, to the point where it’s an obsession. Hell, it’s to the point where he classifies movies as heist films even though they’re not. Movies like Die Hard and Reservoir Dogs, just to name a couple.

So you can imagine my consternation when it was announced there would be a sequel to National Treasure, the terrible 2004 film. I knew that Foley would want to see it, and I knew that no one else would be willing to see it with him.

At the same time, however, I know that I have a penchant for time travel & robot movies, and I have burdened many a (former) friend by asking them to endure them with me.

So it is with these two obsessions as a backdrop that Foley and I have arranged a trade: I will see National Treasure 2 and, in return, Foley will see Alien vs. Predator 2, which is the closest thing to a robot/time travel movie I could find in 2007.

OK, that’s not exactly the most newsworthy development in Hollywood, but I’d like you, the reader, to understand the significant pain that will be bartered here.

In seeing National Treasure 2, I am getting the short end of the deal. First of all, it stars Nick Coppola, one of the worst actors in Hollywood (Travolta gives him a run for his money). Secondly, the original National Treasure had more holes than a cribbage board. Consider:

* Coppola, who played Benjamin Franklin Gates (I only wish I was making up that character name), travels to the arctic to look for an old shipwreck called the Charlotte. Dude, jumps off a snowmobile, takes a couple of hacks at the ice, rubs it with a rag, and poof! There it is. Not only is the frozen ship lodged 2 feet under the surface of the ice, the name plaque is the part showing.
* Gates steals the Declaration of Independence because there is apparently a map hidden on the back of the document. In order to read the map on the back of it, he decides to douse the ancient paper with LEMON JUICE and then dry it off with a HAIR DRYER. That’s not the worst part. No, the worst part is that he is doing this under the supervision of the museum’s CURATOR.

There’s simply not enough space on this blog to cover the rest of the absurdity spewed out by this movie.

Alien vs. Predator 2 has its own problems, not the least of which is two tarnished legacies. Alien, a groundbreaking film, and Predator, at least a very fun movie, just couldn’t be left alone. Jim Cameron did Aliens (sequel to Alien) justice, but the series went downhill after that. It is in Predator 2, however, that the whole Alien vs. Predator debate arose.

At the end of that movie, a trophy case containing the skulls of various conquests is visible in the background of the Predator’s spaceship. One of the skulls is that of an Alien. This sent a shockwave throughout the geek world, and eventually became the impetus for the whole AVP idea.

AVP was a decent film. The acting and script, not surprisingly, each left something to be desired. But one doesn’t go to see AVP for an Oscar turn. One goes to see two creatures fight, and I must admit that there wasn’t enough fighting. Perhaps that will change this time around.

Just rest assured that each film will be reviewed in detail afterward. Assuming we’re not in therapy.


Foley’s Response:

Before I even TOUCH this discussion- I need to clarify the record of this vicious slander being propagated.

I do not consider Die Hard and Reservoir Dogs to be heist films. They’re not, in the classic sense of the genre. There is no debate here. To suggest that I include them in the same genre as Rififi, Topkapi, and Ocean’s 11 is simply not true.

They do, however, feature heists as the backdrop and McGuffins for both movies, a fact most movie-lovers have completely forgotten when thinking about these movies. In Dogs, though the heist itself is never shown, the whole point of the suspicion within the group is that someone tipped the cops off about their heist. And Die Hard actually features a fully detailed heist plot- the thieves take over an office building masquerading as terrorists, make completely unreasonable demands to stall for time (a technique used in many true heist movies, such as Inside Man), break into the safe, then blow up the top of the building (and the hostages) both as a distraction and to lead authorities to believe that the terrorists died in the blast, and then drive away in an ambulance dressed as EMT’s. It’s really a genius plan.

Genius plan aside, the point of the movie is really about the action and one-liners. We all know that. And the fact that there are heists involved does increase my enjoyment and attraction to these movies. They may not be Heist films in the strictest sense, but they are films which feature heists- much like Mission Impossible was not a heist film, but was better because of the heists. It is for that reason alone that I want to see National Treasure 2- the movie will feature some unusual heists that I will have to see, Nick Cage be damned.
So let’s dispense with those ridiculous barbs cast at me and move on.

As for the trade….

Well, I have to admit that Farrell pretty much hit it on the head. Frankly, I out-negotiated him on this one, as I clearly got the better end of the deal.

Do I WANT to see AVP2? Not really. I absolutely LOVE the first two Alien movies, found things to appreciate about David Fincher’s underrated (yet ultimately disappointing) third, and the series just flat out went into the tank from there, barring perhaps the one scene in Resurrection where the Aliens are swimming. As for Predator- I really enjoyed the first one and found the second to be pretty weak.

A bit of trivia regarding the famous scene in Predator 2 featuring the Alien skull- it is widely believed that that scene spawned the idea of merging the franchises, but in reality Dark Horse Comics actually published an Alien vs Predator comic a full year before Predator 2 was released. Still, that scene is probably what brought the concept to the majority of sci-fi fans. I digress.

Back to the deal-
My point is that I’d love to see this franchise combo, if it was done well. But the first one got trashed by reviewers, worked with a low budget, spent no time on script, and we’ve all seen what has happened to the Aliens franchise when done poorly. Please don’t pretend you think the first AVP was worthy of these franchises. Come on, it was directed by Paul W.S. Anderson, creator of gems like Mortal Combat, Resident Evil, and Event Horizon. Are you telling me you don't think AVP could have been so much better?

AVP2? Yet another no-name, no-talent cast, and directed by not one, but TWO first time directors who were previously special effects guys. What does it say when a film needs 2 directors? It’s pretty fair to assume the entire budget is going to FX, but at the expense of any kind of cool script or talent. So what we are going to get is some good effects in extremely lame scenes. By the way, how big of a budget do you think these 2 first-time directors are going to get to work with? I promise it's not nearly as much as a movie like this needs to really do great FX...

Oh by the way- this time the Predators will be fighting Aliens in a small town in the Midwest. The franchise is being fundamentally transformed from sci-fi to horror. That’s not my opinion- AVP2 art director Andrew Li says himself- “It’s a horror movie”.

Um yeah, great call. Let’s take the science fiction out of the Sci-Fi movie. Everyone loves science fiction movies set in the FRIGGIN MIDWEST.

Face it- AVP2 is destined for disaster.

And still, I’m probably getting the better end of the deal. I’m the first to admit- wanting to see National Treasure 2 is indefensible. It doesn’t even qualify as a heist movie, but it features enough heist-moments and conspiracy theories to hook me anyway. There’s no pride in that last statement, believe me. And I share Farrell's hatred of Nick Cage, which doesn't help the situation.

On the other hand, I almost had to see Fantastic Four 2 to get this trade through. THAT would have been a deal from hell.

Read More...

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Sarah Silverman bitch-slapped Paris Hilton


Jessica Biel and Sarah Silverman getting nasty on the MTV movie awards...

Sarah Silverman hosted the MTV movie awards, and made good use of her stage time to say the things on everyone's minds- including absolutely CR-USHING Paris Hilton, who was in the audience to take the humiliation on live tv.

Read more to watch and enjoy. You can call me up to thank me later.


Sarah rips Paris a new a-hole.

I’m gonna save you from the frustration- don’t bother watching Jessica Biel in the pseudo lesbian action with Sarah Silverman- it doesn’t happen. But Will Farrell and Sasha Cohen do get steamy, if you’re into that sort of thing.

Read More...

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Die Cable Die! Or, Why Watch TV on Netflix

Say goodbye to those unsightly commercials!


Commercials suck. Even if you're fast-forwarding through them, you still have to sit and watch. Fuck that.

I don't watch new shows on TV anymore. I wait for the season to come out on DVD, and rent them via Netflix.

If you're not doing this, you should. A good show with no commercials is amazingly more interesting than a good show with commercials. (even commercials you fast-forward through).

Newer TV shows are significantly more cinematic than those of yore, and to break the story constantly with talking snot, tampons with wings, and smug car salesmen, well, it just sucks. When I'm in a story, I want to stay in the story, dammit!

I know, it doesn't sound like it'd make a difference, but it does: I saw the first two seasons of Lost without any breaks. Hell, I saw most of the first season in a single day and it was a religious frickin' experience, it was so damn good.

The downside: you have to wait until the shows come out on DVD. Everyone else is watching and talking about what was on last night, and you have to wait. You're behind the times, surfing the wake of the zeitgeist.

Get over it. Any removal of advertising in your life is a good thing.

(Yes, I know there are ads on either side of this post. But some of you will click on them. You can't help it.)

Read More...

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

6 Rules for Superhero Movies


More villains = lame villains

With the arrival of Spiderman 3, it’s clear that even talented directors like Sam Raimi are still making the same mistakes. So if you’re making/writing a superhero flick, keep these guidelines in mind.

1. If you have more than one main villain, your story sucks.

If your main villain isn’t scary enough, make him scarier! Don’t add other half-assed villains, hoping that will do the trick. Examples: think of the later Batman movie teamups: Two-Face and the Riddler, Poison Ivy and Dr. Freeze - none of them anywhere near as cool as the Joker. Spiderman does the same thing: Doc Ock was frickin’ awesome, but the trio of Goblin Jr./Sandman/Venom? Please - Mary Jane was nastier than all three of them. Even X-Men, which had a lot of bad guys, only had one main villain: Magneto.

2. The coolest scene in any origin flick is the superhero discovering his/her new powers.

Think of Clark Kent jumping higher and higher, Peter Parker trying to figure out his web shooters, and hell, even Jack Nicholson in Wolf (otherwise a crappy movie) where his newly-acquired werewolfness gives his human self new strength and confidence. I hear this was a problem in Catwoman (which looked so bad I skipped it) - she went from shrinking violet to slinky leatherbabe without any transition.

3. The hero enjoys his/her powers.

This seems obvious, but look at Superman Returns, where the Man of Steel spends most of the time moping. Dude! You can FLY!

4. The hero has a tragic/outcast background.

Think about it: if you were suddenly given superhero powers, would you

a) not tell anyone

b) put on a costume and

c) put yourself in real danger on a regular basis for no reward?

Of course you wouldn’t. You’d let everyone know. You’d be on Oprah. You’d be on a Wheaties box. You’d be rich! You’d be invited to all the best parties and you would go to them. There has to be something pretty messed up in your background to want to be a vigilante. This is why Batman is more interesting than Superman. The best superheroes have to be a little crazy.

5. Don’t try to explain the unexplainable.

For example, I don’t need a long thing about how David Banner’s dad used jellyfish DNA and nanobots and experimented on his son, and that’s why the Hulk is green. All I need to know is: the dude got hit with gamma radiation, and turned into the Hulk. Ta da. I know that would never happen in real life, but I don’t care - I’m not watching a movie for real life. I don’t care how Superman can fly (which muscle does he use, exactly, to go faster? What does he clench?). Most superheroes are essentially magical creatures, and that’s fine. Accept it and move on to the story.

6. Trust the source material, and you get Sin City and 300.

Ignore the source material and get League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.

Read More...